Crucifixes: open letter to the Constitutional Court protest living (there) mind against the unfair and unjust sentence by which justified pretext the presence of the crucifix in the courtroom and the ouster of Judge Tosti worthy by the judiciary for having rightly abstained from the hearings in the presence of the crucifix-Catholic Christian. The ostentation of the symbol of a secular religion violates the rights of equality before the law citadino as set forth, among other things, the basic Article 3 of our Constitution, which underlies the legality of a secular, democratic and law.
The infamy of your sentence is well summarized by Chiara Saracens in his excellent short incisive and convincing article, "The crucifix in a country with limited sovereignty," published in La Repubblica on March 15, 2011. The Republic of Berluskoni - As you know those judges constitutional goers and associates of dinners and snacks with the Sultan piduista before making decisions that concern him - he finally (?) Enslaved the country to the State of Vatican City, reducing it to the province Christian, Catholic, breeches , papal skullcap, Taliban fundamentalist.
So I had those judges of the Court is not friendly and violated the principles that should defend and promote their work wisely with the arbitration.
"hate what is noble scoundrels" (Quintilian)
